More security flaws found in Apple AirTags
After jailbreaking AirTags, security researchers were able to repurpose it to send a malicious URL to an iPhone.
Read MoreThe Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 has been the subject of controversy lately, with some of those fortunate enough to actually get hold of one of the graphics cards suffering at the hands of instability and crashing, but a freshly released graphics driver appears to provide a solution (or at least a marked improvement).
Nvidia’s GeForce driver version 456.55 emerged yesterday with a few major changes, including support for Nvidia’s Reflex feature in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare (and Warzone), and also a note that: “The new Game Ready Driver also improves stability in certain games on RTX 30 Series GPUs.”
The company doesn’t elaborate on anything other than ‘improving stability’ with Ampere cards, but apparently RTX 3080 owners who have been experiencing crashes when playing games – which has sparked off a whole fiery debate about the components used on third-party 3080 graphics cards – are reporting that the new driver makes a big difference.
As PC World observes, they had a problematic RTX 3080 card which was consistently crashing in Horizon Zero Dawn with the previous Nvidia driver, but with this new version, those crashes no longer happen.
This is backed up by a lot of other reports on Reddit too, like for example this RTX 3080 owner: “Zotac Trinity 3080 owner here, was getting crashing in all games at default clock since launch day. The new driver has stopped the crashing completely and I no longer have to reduce core clock by -50MHz to prevent crashing. It improved stability greatly.”
What does the new driver do exactly? Well, PC World notes that the Horizon Zero Dawn benchmark was crashing regularly at the same point with an EVGA RTX 3080 FTW3 – when the GPU clock hit 2025MHz – and with the new driver, boosts are now running at between 1980MHz and 1995MHz maximum. In other words, they aren’t going over 2GHz (the previously mentioned pain point for crashes to start happening).
So the solution has apparently been to drop that clock speed very slightly, which could maybe provoke some annoyance in the Nvidia GPU community out there, but really shouldn’t. It seems like what’s really happening is that overzealous boosting – remember, the speeds reached in real-world gaming are well beyond the rated boost anyway – has been corrected.
Naturally enough, the difference in 30MHz of boost clock is not something you’re going to notice when playing a game, anyway (and it’s certainly better than the 50-100MHz downclocks folks have been manually applying as a workaround previously).
Of course, these anecdotal reports aren’t concrete evidence that this boost tuning with the latest Nvidia driver marks a complete end to the crashing issues that some folks have been suffering, but it’s looking promising at this point.
It definitely underlines that this RTX 3080 stability issue isn’t just about hardware, and even when you do consider the hardware aspects, the much-talked-about type of capacitors used (POSCAP or MLCC, or a mix) are only one element in a much broader picture of graphics card design (we discuss this in-depth here).
Nvidia has chimed in on the capacitor issue too, issuing a statement to say: “Regarding partner board designs, our partners regularly customize their designs and we work closely with them in the process. The appropriate number of POSCAP vs MLCC groupings can vary depending on the design and is not necessarily indicative of quality.”
The translation of which is that it doesn’t matter whether a graphics card runs with one type of capacitor or another in terms of quality, but as we’ve said, the whole design of the board needs to be taken into account. As PC World has found, an all-POSCAP GPU from EVGA now appears to be behaving itself fine with the new Nvidia driver in place.
A further element which could be worth throwing into the cauldron on the hardware side is not just the wattage, but the quality – and age – of the PC’s power supply driving the Ampere graphics card, which just goes to show how many potential considerations are bubbling around here. There are a lot of factors weighing in, for sure, but at least Nvidia has promptly delivered a simple seeming fix that appears effective enough at first glance.
After jailbreaking AirTags, security researchers were able to repurpose it to send a malicious URL to an iPhone.
Read MoreYou'll get a 10th generation Intel Core, 16GB RAM, NVMe SSD and full HD display with this Black Friday deal.
Read MoreThe iPad Pro (2022) could be one of the best tablets of 2022, if Apple carries on its winning streak: the iPad Pro (2021) was one of our favorite slates from last year, as Apple's Pro tablets offer loads of power and great-looking screens. We've heard a few rumors about this upcoming iPad Pro so far, and that's because some think the new slates could be a reinvention for the series after a few years of similar-looking slates. Apple needs to make sure its iPad Pro (2022) is impressive, and that's because competition is coming: the anticipated Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 family could steal its thunder, especially if the rumored Tab S8 Ultra is as big and powerful as leaks suggest. Ahead of an official unveiling for the Galaxy Tab S8, we've listed all the information provided by leaks and rumors below. There's also a wish-list for the tablet, which explores what we want to see based on its predecessors and trends in the tablet market. It sounds like the 11-inch iPad Pro for 2022 could get mini-LED screen tech, which was only used for the 12.9-inch model for the 2021 models. The iPad Pro (2021) was launched in April and released in May, roughly a year on from the 2020 model, so it makes sense that the 2022 version could follow the same pattern. We've got no official confirmation or even rumors of that, but it seems likely. As Apple's most expensive line of tablets, you can't expect the new iPad Pros to be cheap. The iPad Pro 11 (2021) started at $799 / £749 / AU$1,199 and went up to $2,099 / £1,899 / AU$3,099, while the 12.9-inch model started at $1,099 / £999 / AU$1,649 and capped out at $2,399 / £2,149 / AU$3,549. We haven't heard information on the new iPad Pro pricing, but these prices likely won't get changed too much in 2022. The first thing to know about the iPad Pro 2022 is that despite talk that Apple is exploring larger iPad Pro screen sizes for some point in the future, it will probably be the same size as the iPad Pro 2021, meaning you'd be able to get it in 11-inch and 12.9-inch sizes. That's what Ming-Chi Kuo (an analyst with a great track record for Apple information) reckons anyway. In the same report, Kuo claimed that the iPad Pro 11 (2022) would get a Mini LED screen. The iPad Pro 12.9 (2022) apparently will as well, but that's not an upgrade for the 12.9-inch model, as the current version already uses Mini LED. It's worth noting that we had previously heard that the iPad Pro 2022 might get an OLED screen instead, but more recent reports suggest that switch is further out. A screen change which seems more likely is that the 11-inch iPad Pro could get mini-LED, a display tech only used on the 12.9-inch model in 2021. In other news, according to a report, the next iPad Pro will follow suit from the iPhone 12 and adopt MagSafe - that's the ability to connect, via magnets, to clip-on peripherals like magnetic chargers and cases. In addition this report suggests the tablet will come with a glass back and will support wireless and reverse wireless charging - the latter is so you can power up other gadgets using the tablet. Later rumors suggested that the tablet might not have an entirely glass back, as that would make it incredibly fragile, but that the Apple logo on the rear could be made of this material, so MagSafe would work in that one particular spot. We've also heard that future iPad Pro models might be focused on landscape orientation, with a horizontal Apple logo and cameras. This could also mean a new aspect ratio, though that's just speculation for now. It's worth noting that the source of this leak claims not to be sure whether this change will happen in time for the iPad Pro 2022 though. A major name in Apple news said that the iPad Pro (2022) would see a redesign over its predecessors, but while the source holds weight, there isn't actually much information regarding what 'redesign' actually means. If you've already read the pricing section above, we probably don't need to go into more detail as to why we want to see a lower price from the iPad Pro (2022). iPad Pro devices are incredibly expensive tablets, and if you're buying extras like Apple Pencils, keyboard folios, carrying cases, various apps and more, you could find yourself forking over loads just to use the thing. While the iPad Air 4 does offer lots of the Pro models' specs at a lower cost, it's not quite the same, so some people might want to get the iPad Pro (2022)'s power without the huge cost. Talking of expensive, let's discuss the Apple Pencil. It's a useful addition for the tablet - some would call it vital - but unlike Huawei's M Pen or Samsung's S Pen, the stylus doesn't come bundled with the tablet. This means, if you're considering buying the tablet and want the Apple Pencil too, the cost proposition is even higher, which might nudge you towards one of the competing premium tablets. Plus, bundling the Apple Pencil would help Apple crack down on the myriad knock-off Apple Pencils that don't always work as intended. We found both the 2021 and 2020 iPad Pros lasted about ten hours of standard use on a single charge. Sounds fine, right? Well, no, because 'standard use' involves watching Netflix, browsing social media and the like. If you use your iPad Pro as a professional (like the name suggests), by editing video, music or images, working on multiple documents simultaneously, or even playing games, you can find the battery drains incredibly quickly. In fact, battery drain on the iPad Pro is so fast that we've often found plugging it in while working only offsets the power use, but doesn't charge it back up. Power improvements need to be found, whether that's by adding software optimizations that reduce power drain, or simply shoving in a bigger battery. Oh, and faster charging would be nice too - in this day and age, 18W simply isn't fast enough. According to app developers, the iPad Pro (2021) limits how much RAM each app can use to only 5GB - since the top-end version of the slate offers 16GB of RAM, that's a strangely low cap. This could be an issue for apps that need lots of RAM to run, including AR tools and editing software, and indeed some developers have complained about this limitation. A RAM cap could stop developers creating apps that need more power too, which would have implications for iPad software in the long run. We'd like to see this cap dropped, either for the iPad Pro (2022) or maybe beforehand for all iPads. iPadOS is a fine tablet operating system, but there are still some important productivity tools that are missing, despite iPadOS 15's improvements. Multitasking is an issue, as you can't view three apps simultaneously, or split the screen horizontally, two use cases which certain users might find very useful. iPadOS 15's Universal Control looks useful, as it lets you drag and drop files and windows between your iPad and a Mac - but iPhone compatibility would make this feature truly seamless for people. There aren't too many useful home screen widgets for the key productivity apps either, though that's not something Apple can do much about, as it's down to developers.Cut to the chase
iPad Pro (2022) price and availability
News and rumors
What we want to see
1. Lower the price
2. Bundle the Apple Pencil
3. Improve the battery life
4. No processing power restrictions
5. iPadOS improvements
Google's Play Media Experience Program will reward eligible developers with a 15 percent Play Store fee.
Read MoreWant to hire best people for your project? Look no further you came to the right place!