This file-sharing app with over a billion downloads has some major security flaws
Shockingly, the app’s developer hasn’t fixed the vulnerabilities for over three months.
Read MoreWelcome to the liminal space between where we know the date, time, and place of an Apple event and have almost no confirmed information about its content. The most obvious response is to fill that gap with musings about the possibilities, especially those surrounding what we think will be our first glimpse of Appleâs AR Glasses.
To refresh your memory, many of us now believe Apple gave us a barely concealed hint in its March Event invite and an executive tweet that itâs bringing the AR wearables.
Apple Glass, as the rumor mill likes to call them, should lean heavily on Appleâs already significant augmented reality skills. Owners of modern iPhones and iPads have seen how they can while looking through the deviceâs cameras, see virtual sneakers that they can walk around, a full-scale augmented LEGO creation that they can play with, and virtually dissect a woe begotten frog.
Thanks to powerful sensors, on-board processing, and ARKit 2, the effects are impressively realistic and get even better when you pair the iPhone 13 Pro and iPad Proâs Lidar scanners, which can create a 3D mesh of the environment and let your AR creations interact more naturally with the real world.
Appleâs ability to transfer all that AR hardware and software expertise is not in question. Its ability to squeeze it into eyeglasses is more of an open one.
We know that the possibility of Apple revealing its AR glasses still lives in the realm of maybe, but since the assumption is weâre seeing the first working concept and not the final product on March 8, thereâs still time to offer some important product development advice.
Appleâs legendary industrial design will be put to the test with Apple Glass. Weâve worn their unusual and initially rejected AirPods in our ears (now we love them in all forms), and the elegant Apple Watch on our wrist, but something on our face, under our eyebrows, and over our eyes, is something else entirely.
To make Apple Glass, even if Apple puts much of the processing responsibility on your iPhone, means finding aesthetically pleasing places to put cameras, sensors (maybe LiDAR), transparent screens, and batteries.
The last is where virtually every smart glass manufacturer has struggled. You canât really hide the bulk of a battery, though most give it their best shot by stuffing them into the stems.
For Apple, I suggest they find a way to spread the battery load throughout the frames and hide camera lenses and sensors behind one-way-mirrored glass or plastic.
I donât want to see a single port on my Apple Glass. Obviously, the glasses will connect to your iPhone via Bluetooth, but we still have to charge them. I donât even want to see visible, copper connectors on Apple Glass. Qi, MagSafe-based charging is what I want.
In the Apple Event invite tweet Appleâs Global Head of Marketing Greg Joswiak shared, the video appears to be a demonstration of the new Apple Glass AR viewport.Â
It looks immersive, but that might be misleading. So many previous AR glasses have offered a tiny field of view. The early Microsoft Holo Lens viewport looked like a 42-inch TV floating in front of you. Google Glass's viewport looked like a tiny TV set that you had to look up at to catch a glimpse.
I want Apple Glass to feel as immersive as that short video made it look. To do so, Apple must figure out how to marry tiny-screen projection or display technology with a design that wraps around your face instead of sitting in front of it. I mean, Apple Glasses should have the look of a cool set of modern shades, not old-school black-framed eyeglasses (not even the nicer Ray-Ban Stories Facebook is hawking).
Our eyes will be close to whatever screen technology Apple plans to use. Assuming itâs OLED (which nicely supports transparency), I hope itâs HD or higher. Anything lower and weâll see every pixel. I fully expect Apple, the King of Super Retina displays, to get this right. If they donât, Apple Glass will be a disaster.
This one is personal. I cannot use or even properly test smart glasses without prescription lens support. Say what you will about Google Glass, but the lack of lenses on the base system made it possible for me to wear my prescription frames along with it (yes, I looked ridiculous).
Apple has an opportunity to get this right out of the box. Making sure you can order Apple Glasses with your prescription and the built-in displays will make them more expensive (Iâm guessing $999 to start), but I think it will be worth it.
Donât skimp on memory and storage. Itâs a bonus thought because I think it will only matter if Apple doesnât pair Apple Glasses with your iPhone. If they do, all the CPU, memory, and storage load will be on the phone, not the glasses. If they do not, Apple Glass must start with some sort of new Apple Silicon (could it fit an M1, maybe an M1 mini?), 8GB of RAM, and at least 128 GB of storage.
There is the chance that we wonât see Appleâs AR glasses next week. If that happens, Apple can just keep this advice in its back pocket for when it is finally ready to introduce Apple Glass to the world.
Shockingly, the app’s developer hasn’t fixed the vulnerabilities for over three months.
Read MoreIntel’s Core i9-13900K, its next-gen flagship processor (presumably), could hit seriously fast Turbo speeds a good chunk higher than even the mighty 12900KS manages. The Core i9-12900KS is the freshly released supercharged variant of the 12900K, and the CPU can boost to 5.5GHz right out of the box. However, in theory, Intel’s 13th-gen Raptor Lake silicon will be capable of taking clock speeds 200MHz or 300MHz faster than this, as rumored by hardware leaker Raichu on Twitter. RPL will over the new highest freq which was created by 12900KS.More 2-300 MHz is possible.April 13, 2022 In theory, then, the Raptor Lake flagship could end up hitting 5.7GHz or 5.8GHz, which would be pretty staggering speeds straight off the bat with no tweaking or knowledge of overclocking needed. We’re talking about the boost for the CPU’s performance cores of course – the efficiency cores would run slower, as ever – and furthermore, the maximum speed for a pair of cores, too (you won’t get full pelt across all-cores, naturally; with the 12900KS, all-core boost tops out at 5.2GHz, 300Hz shy of the max Turbo). What isn’t clear is if when Raichu talks about Raptor Lake reaching these heights, whether they’re referring to the Core i9-13900K, or an eventual 13900KS higher-binned variant – if Intel even takes that route. (It doesn’t always make a ‘KS’ edition of the flagship, and in fact the last one before the 12900KS was the 9900KS, so three generations back). Whatever the case, based on this rumor, the broad expectation is that we can anticipate Raptor Lake delivering a significant boost to clock speeds, and of course that won’t be all. A new generation will inevitably bring an IPC uplift (more Instructions per Clock means you get even more out of faster clock speeds), and even if Raptor Lake is only a straight refresh of Alder Lake, it has some interesting trimmings on the side. Like a major on-board cache boost to pep up gaming frame rates, for example. Let’s not forget that the 13900K is rumored to be upping the efficiency cores from 8 to 16 (while keeping the same 8 performance cores), so the flagship CPU will theoretically be a 24-core affair (with 32-threads, as efficiency cores don’t have hyper-threading). And that should give the CPU a little more oomph, too. The upshot is that despite being just a basic refresh in theory, Raptor Lake could smooth out any rough edges in Alder Lake – which is Intel’s first real foray into hybrid cores, of course, Lakefield aside – to deliver quite a punch. Let’s hope so, although the other question here is whether AMD will get the first blow in by launching Zen 4 before Raptor Lake. While Intel’s Raptor Lake has been rumored for a Q3 debut (multiple times), that’s not certain, and other speculation has contended that AMD may also be shooting to get next-gen Zen 4 processors out in Q3, possibly aiming to beat Intel to market. Which, to be fair, Team Red really needs to do if possible, because if Intel’s 13th-gen range turns up first, AMD’s Ryzen 5000 series is going to be left looking rather underpowered indeed. Via Wccftech
Analysis: Raptor Lake could deliver quite a punch – but will Zen 4 land the first blow?
Software company Oracle has reportedly managed to court the popular video-sharing app for its US operations.
Read MoreGPU-Z validation entry suggests an official launch is imminent
Read MoreWant to hire best people for your project? Look no further you came to the right place!